Friday was extremely successful as we all presented our library case studies and began to brainstorm for our addition design. I felt that presenting these libraries gave me a lot of knowledge on how a library works and the practical layouts for a library based on their location/ setting. I also really enjoyed being able to see how everyone chose to present their case studies. It's always helpful to see multiple examples of presentation boards and then deciding which ones worked the best and why. Personally, I really liked the layout of mine and Hannah's boards, but I was also drawn to the boards that didn't have as much of a background, or even the ones that were simply white. Regardless, the presentations were very beneficial in gaining a new perspective on not only libraries, but also how to design and create a successful presentation.
Monday was, well it was Monday. I wasn't feeling particularly motivated, but I am very excited about the next step in our design process. I honestly just don't have enough experience in Revit, otherwise I'd be a lot more willing to hop on the computer and work on the topography, etc. However, I know that learning all of this will really help me out with this project and future projects. I'm ready to keep moving on our design and develop a true program for the space. After getting the chance to visit our site, and study two other libraries in depth, I feel that we have a good grasp on how this library should work and I'm so excited to see how everyone approaches the new addition design.
Tuesday, September 30, 2014
Thursday, September 25, 2014
Library Research
Our library research is well under way and our trip to the Ringer on library was very successful. I feel that most of the students are very visual learners in the architecture program and it was extremely beneficial to get to experience the space that we'll be working on. We got to see the difficulties that face the current design and the librarian was able to give us a lot of input on what could be done and what the real issues were in the current design. I also thought it was really interesting how the librarian specifically talked about architects and how many architects don't take the worker into account when creating the design. She was able to point out so many failed opportunities that were strictly ignored by the architects. All the comments she made just made me want to design something so great for this library because these people love their job and love what they do. They should love the building they work in as well.
On Wednesday, we were able to show off our display boards to James and I feel very confident in our design. Hannah was able to find a really dynamic layout to present our information and I was able to mimic the design in Indesign and they look awesome. Now we're just finishing up the floor plans in autocad and pulling out all the information to finish up our boards. It'll be so cool to see everyone's ideas and comparisons on Friday!
On Wednesday, we were able to show off our display boards to James and I feel very confident in our design. Hannah was able to find a really dynamic layout to present our information and I was able to mimic the design in Indesign and they look awesome. Now we're just finishing up the floor plans in autocad and pulling out all the information to finish up our boards. It'll be so cool to see everyone's ideas and comparisons on Friday!
Thursday, September 18, 2014
The Master Builder
Over the years, architecture has lost its touch.
Architecture has lost its sense of artistry and mastery. There has been a
disconnect between the fine art of architecture and the economical world we
live in today. Refabricating Architecture
brings up a very interesting argument on the disconnect of art and commodity in
architecture today. It seems that architecture either embodies one or the other
of art or commodity and not both. The real question is, why can’t we have both?
Why is there such a difference in today’s architecture compared to the many
years before now? I believe that the answer lies in chapter two of Refabricating Architecture when the
authors talk about the “master builder.” I believe the master builder is the
solution to connecting the art and commodity in architecture.
Art is defined as the expression or application of skill and
imagination; while commodity is defined as a marketable item produced to
satisfy wants or needs. In my mind, these should be the hands and feet of
architecture and should have never been separated. However, as new ways of
assembling have come into play, we have lost much of the craft that commodity
used to bring. The art that used to be involved in commodity has been cut out
of the equation because we now have quicker ways of doing things and have
divided the idea of architecture into too many fields to keep track of. When we
have so many people involved in a final product, we tend to lose sight of the
original plan, the original goal and beauty of a structure. We’re too concerned
with cost and time now and not enough with preserving true architectural
beauty.
Like I mentioned before, I believe that the master builder
was able to embody not only commodity but also art. I believe that someone so
skilled in all fields of completing a building has the knowledge and design
ability to create something beautiful and economical. In the past the master
builder was a person who was the combined roles of architect, builder,
engineer, and scientist. With all these skills, this master builder was able to
imagine, design, and create some of the most magnificent buildings our world
has seen. In today’s world, all of those roles are filled by separate people,
therefore creating a disconnect in the path to a final product. Our society has
taken it upon them to divide the different career paths of architect, builder,
engineer and scientist, but in reality, we need people that can do all of these
things. We need to be involved enough in every step in creating a building. We
should know how to assemble a building, find the products available for use,
and choose which material substance is best for our design.
We have to step away from just designing the aesthetics and
plan of the building and truly get to the bottom of the whole production and
learn everything from the inside out. I want to be an architect that knows
every in and out of a building and can discuss every step to any professional I
work with. I don’t think I could ever be a master builder, like they had in the
past, but I want to be a well rounded architect.
Monday, September 15, 2014
LiBrArY
Today, we got started on the research for different libraries before and after the computer age. I'm pretty intrigued by this idea of a case study and I think that by Friday, everyone is going to have a great presentation. I'm also pretty excited because Hannah found a super cool library from California, so I'm really interested in how the library was laid out and what we can take from their design to create our addition in the local library.
it was legen.. wait for it… dary
We finally got to see all the incredible, larger than life, models and they are too cool. I loved getting the chance to see what everyone was able to accomplish and see the paint choices everyone made for their final model. I'm also super pleased with mine and Hannah's final butterfly. I love the gold and silver and it's awesome having positioned right outside the studio so that we can see it every time we come to school.
I also enjoyed getting to talk about the project as a whole and coming up with new ideas for students to do it in the future. I think it would be a great design project to be able to design a new creature and work together on a base model as a class. I also thought it may be cool to create humans through this no-glue joint methodology. Whatever James ends up doing to revise this project, it will be great. I felt that this project really helped me look into building at a larger scale and becoming familiar with weight distribution and strength in joints.
I also enjoyed getting to talk about the project as a whole and coming up with new ideas for students to do it in the future. I think it would be a great design project to be able to design a new creature and work together on a base model as a class. I also thought it may be cool to create humans through this no-glue joint methodology. Whatever James ends up doing to revise this project, it will be great. I felt that this project really helped me look into building at a larger scale and becoming familiar with weight distribution and strength in joints.
Wednesday, September 10, 2014
Call me Thumbelina
So after today, I'm getting extremely excited about the final product of our butterfly. We had some minor complications involving the thickness of our wood and the joint slots we had designed, but hey, it's all fixed now! We ended up piecing it all together in the studio today and it stands taller than me, so that means over 5'4 (yeah I'm no giant). It's awesome though and after about an hour of sanding in Hannah's garage, literally sweating everywhere, it's ready to be painted! We got some gold and silver spray paint and it's going to look so majestic. So ready for tomorrow once it's completely painted and ready to be presented on Friday.
Monday, September 8, 2014
no class did not equal no work
Today was very productive regardless of the fact that we didn't have studio. I actually got to campus earlier than normal on a Monday and was able to discuss the project with Hannah and figure out exactly how we wanted to approach this massive butterfly cut out. Tomorrow we'll be getting all of our supplies out to the ranch to have it ready and cut as soon as possible. I also worked a lot on structures homework because that seems to have a heavy workload as well. I was able to finish my homework and successfully finish the model to go along with the homework. I felt pretty accomplished for the day and I'm excited to see how classes are going this semester.
Friday, September 5, 2014
Today we got to talk about our models and the ways we can improve their structure before we complete an even bigger model. I also got to go to work today and paint which I love so that was exciting and I got to make money. But class was definitely a good time and I got to learn a lot about connections and how to strengthen and revise our butterfly! I'm so excited for the next model
Wednesday, September 3, 2014
Throughout history, architecture seems to have been defined
in multiple different ways and expressed through very different concepts. Some
believe that architecture is simply expressed through buildings and that is
all. While others find that many engineering processes, that include cars,
ships, and planes, are also architecture. Strangely, there doesn’t seem to be a
clear answer, so we must decide personally what we think architecture is and
what makes an architect an architect. What makes an architect stand out from an
engineer, but also the other way around. In the book Refabricating Architecture, the authors talk about the opportunity
to make an Architecture with a capital A. The authors believe that Architecture
is, in sense, a process that includes not only the architect but everyone in
between when creating a structure, space, or mass.
To me,
architecture is not only a building, or even the designing of a building, but
the experience through a space. Architects work hard on explaining why they’re
doing something because they want to make people realize the back story and
feel integrated in the project. Architecture is everything that goes into the
final project regardless of what that project may be. Architecture is the
reasoning and the meaning behind each detail and the specific intention of a
detail. Architects don’t typically add something for show, so I love the idea
of knowing what they’re thinking and the processes that they had to use to get
there.
In Refabricating Architecture the authors
claim that Architecture (with a capital A) means that the design and process is
not only the architect, but everyone that is involved in the construction and
design of the project. That means that the clients, the engineers, the
contractors and the architects are included in this process. With many
structures, I feel like it could be easy for an architect to get a big head and
just expect to tell everyone else what to do, but in reality, there’s so much
more that we need involved in architecture. We need more for less and
Architecture can provide that. We can have everyone working on a central goal
and working as one. With all the skills that these people can contribute, any
project can be done more efficiently and simply better. The amount of systems
that currently go into a single building are overpowering and can easily be
divided and conquered through many department.
It seems that architecture, is
simply the art of being an architect but Architecture is the process and if we
were to employ Architecture we would be much better off in the field. The idea
of using everyone to create the final result would change the process as we’ve
seen it and improve it greatly. Taking and building large portions of the final
product off site simply makes more sense and will completely transform the
scheduling enterprise. We must design a building to not only accommodate the
floors and walls, but each system that it encompasses. And we must accommodate every
person that can change the spectrum of architecture to Architecture.
http://www.theprospect.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/architecture.jpg
Monday, September 1, 2014
Monday- First Day of Class- no we didn't get labor day off
Today was fairly productive considering I left my bed before 3pm. I wasn't too thrilled about having class on labor day, but I'm fairly excited about my studio. Today, we put together different insects that conjoin through cut out connections rather than a glue etc. Hannah and I also painted ours and it looks awesome so I'm pretty stoked about that. Here's our butterfly, pre-painted, in it's natural habitat.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)